TDC Me

Your Say

Together we can achieve more

  • Home
  • Inclusive Council
  • Environment
  • Water
  • Housing
  • Business
  • Transport
  • Dam
  • Contact
  • About
    • Testimonials

Tis Election Season

16/08/2025

And dramatically, it is possibly the most poorly contested local Government elections in New Zealand’s history. Many candidates being elected unopposed and in at least one case a by-election will be required because there isn’t enough candidates on the ballot to full the available roles.

Tasman fares no better. Many sitting councillors have jumped ship (some are saying that they didn’t want to face the music for the mess they have created) and few people are putting their hands up to replace them. The Maori electorate candidate is unopposed. Several other wards leave voters with a very limited choice.

Perhaps the lack of enthusiasm is inspired by the bagging that Councils have received from central Government recently. Or perhaps people believe you can’t change Council, which they are right about if you don’t vote, or continue to vote for more-of-the-same and expect a different result.

As you drive by the billboards, read the fancy slogans and hear the grand promises, take a moment to reflect on past campaigns. The reason that seasoned campaigners say whatever they think the voters want to hear is because they know that they won’t be held to account when they fail to deliver.

Let’s look at a couple of the few sitting councillors standing again and measure them against their promises. The mayor, for example, first campaigned under the “Positive Change” banner, claiming his experience could keep us within the debt and rates caps. Since then, the debt cap has been scrapped, and rate increases have doubled—or more—beyond the original cap. Positive change, apparently.

Councillor Mailing has campaigned for “less staff,” he told a Richmond Town Hall meeting that it was his job to make sure the dam was completed “on time and on budget,” and most recently he campaigned for “affordability.” Since I left the Council 3 years ago the staff numbers have exploded by 100 or so to in excess of 400. The dam that he took responsibility for was over a year late and cost more than $100 million over the budget. I am not sure what your idea of affordable is, but his voting record shows he has rubber stamped every staff increase, rate increase, and debt increase. You can see how your councillors voted by downloading this collection of recorded votes on annual plans and major affordability decisions—records made public only because Councillor Greening called a division, the only time votes are attributed to names.

The most recent annual plan saw a proposed astronomical rate increase and so staff were instructed to go way and find some cuts. They came back with the idea of doing away with several public toilets, no longer providing doggy doo bags, and halving the street sweeping. This shows a desperate scraping the bottom of the barrel attempt to save pennies.

Since that fateful plan, the Tasman District has experienced several major weather events that have caused millions of dollars in damages. Residents are now demanding actual river and road maintenance on a regular basis. And most of the forest that has traditionally helped lower rates is now lying on the ground. How will a more-of-the-same Council fund this given that the barrel has been scraped?

Going cap-in-hand to an equally broke central government is not a long-term solution . Neither is cutting maintenance to rural roads as already touted by the head of Engineering. Nor is endlessly increasing debt. Central government is even proposing rate caps that will leave little room for spending if interest rates rise again.

The Kempthorne/King/Bryant legacy is one of financial ruin. If we keep electing more-of-the-same councillors, it’s likely unelected commissioners will soon be appointed to run the council . Possibly why the mayor says that his will be his last campaign. If you think this is far-fetched then know that our current CEO came directly from ECANZ, the Canterbury Regional Council, where she helped steer them into exactly that predicament.

Ballooning staff numbers are unsustainable. The current culture is unacceptable. It’s appalling that compliance staff were out inspecting vacant tiny homes—making sure they hadn’t been rented—a week after the Tasman District emerged from a state of emergency, when families had lost homes and were cut off by road washouts.

This is not the Tasman I grew up in. And it is not the future we should leave our children.

It is time to vote out the remaining business as usual rubber-stampers and appoint a Council prepared to make radical change.

As always: This message is approved by Dean McNamara – candidate in the Moutere/Waimea ward. You can contact me here.

Filed Under: Historical, Inclusive Council, Vote For Change, Your Say Tagged With: Dean McNamara, Debt, spending, Tasman District Council

Misquotes And Other Lies

31/08/2022

It was very nice of Stuff to include me in their nationwide hit-pieces against those protesting against this Government’s “two classes of society.” Clearly an example of what $50 million dollars of support can buy.

I found it appalling that during a declared State of Emergency a Stuff reporter contacted me and suggested the most important thing to her readers was my current vaccination status. It was insulting to the people of this region and definitely insulting to me.

She was not upfront about what type of article she was writing, although it was obvious when one of the first questions was about my vaccination status. From that point the open and honest dialogue that I have in the past enjoyed with Stuff was no longer on the table (including supplying them with the picture that re-used without permission).

To be honest and upfront, my vaccination status is nobody’s business but my own. However, as it is no secret: I went to the US to study around the turn of the century (yes I am that old) and for my visa I had to be more than up to date with vaccinations. So I am fully vaccinated. What I have not done is participate in an experimental gene therapy.

There are various reasons for my sudden “anti-vax” about face which I am happy to discuss, but won’t here because I am sure most readers aren’t that interested. What I will say is that when I saw a similar approach to the dam being used with this gene therapy I knew something was fishy. By similar, I mean we label anyone that is asking questions as “anti-dammer” or “anti-vaxxer” and then we don’t have to address their concerns just because we have labelled them. Instead of addressing the issues we just drown them out with propaganda. We don’t go back and apologize/ explain things we “got wrong” like P95s or hibernating bats being responsible for spreading the virus or “we won’t be mandating in NZ.”

Back to the Stuff smear piece. The question that the reporter actually asked me was about a comment that I made concerning Bill Gates being involved with the virus. To which my comment was “of course Bill Gates is involved.” The reporter then wanted a further quote so I said “he is the one supplying the vaccines.” When the reporter that clearly had done no research of her own in preparing to interview me asked for further clarification I sent her off to do her own homework, clearly she lives under a rock. But for those that haven’t heard, Bill Gates (and his foundation) have been buying up vaccine patents (among other things) for years. His net worth jumped by many billions during the global roll out. Of course I was not quoted on this.

One other interesting comment on that topic is that Bill Gates, guru of all things vaccine, said the vaccine did not prevent transmission some two years ago while our podium of all things truthful continued to push the lie that you needed to be “vaccinated for Aotearoa.” Saying that by getting vaccinated you were saving your grandma.

Yes, I did ask for clarification what the reporter meant when she asked if I was involved with Voices For Freedom (VFF) because I have seen the previous hit pieces Stuff has been doing. Not only did they take a quote about VFF saying their supporters should “make NZ ungovernable” out of context, they have included a partial quote of mine saying I protested with VFF. I said I attended Wellington and VFF were also there so in that sense I have protested with VFF. There are a lot great people involved with VFF all with their own stories to tell. We have been branded as a lower class of citizen by this Government and choose to protest against such disgraceful comments by a supposedly civilized democratic society.

Trevor Mallard also goes down as one of the most disgraceful members of New Zealand society with his pathetic response to a lawful assembly of citizens. When I saw (not on mainstream media obviously) the sprinkler saga and the music (of sorts) playing along with the police brutality on women and children, I did decide that I should go to Wellington to voice my disgust as well. For those that did not attend you missed a great experience apart from the orchestrated finale that played out under the press balcony very conveniently.

Just like the Waimea Irrigation Dam, I do not have to prove anything, I just have to sit and wait, time will reveal all. Like with the dam the true cost is being revealed (not over yet sorry), the true cost of the (so-called) vaccine is also yet to be revealed. People telling their story, or “claimed” story as Stuff quotes Aly Cook, will have their say. Unfortunately, there are many people in that category like Rory Nairn whose family have been struggling for months to get their voice heard.

One question that I had for the reporter (I use that term in its loosest possible sense) was whether or not she was going to do an article on candidates standing under a Labour Party ticket. Because those candidates have to sign a memorandum of intent (contract) that binds them to voting according to Labour Party direction. Which to me is of far more concern than some loose connection with a protest group. Ever wonder why some Councils did not object to the Three Waters asset grab? Or perhaps, why Rotorua council is selling off reserves for social housing? However, I was informed that Stuff reporters are “too busy” to cover everything. Clearly your $50 million bribe has a bias – or is it a contract that binds you to only publishing Labour Party directed propaganda?

If six years of serving in Council is to be defined by a Stuff attempt at a character smear by associating me with a group who were not even dreamed would be necessary much less in existence when I was elected then so be it. My message has remained consistent, as has my voting record, for the past six years and it will be my testament. I can assure you, that there are those I serve with that do not have voting records that match their campaign promises. For instance, “I will keep us within our debt and rate caps,” and yet I will consistently vote to spend unbudgeted money when we have no contingency left.

While we still live in the remnants of a democracy, you have the opportunity to elect candidates that represent what matters to you most. If my vaccination status, or my objection to Government over-reach, is more important to you than sensible Council spending and rates brought under control, then don’t elect me. I have a yacht to learn to sail – if you give free lessons (I also have unaffordable rates to pay) then get in touch!

Filed Under: Vote For Change, Your Say Tagged With: Dean McNamara, Election, Mandates, Stuff you

Transport

20/08/2019

Horse and Cart

We need a transport network that will serve the needs of Tasman residents now and into the future.

Everyone would like NZTA to sort out the State Highway issues through Richmond and into Nelson. We would also like to see the promised upgrade to Motueka back on the agenda. It is the only project outlined in the Regional Land Transport Strategy For Nelson City and Tasman District 1993 that has not been completed. Twenty Six years is long enough on the waiting list.

The Council should keep lobbying NZTA for action as there are plenty of other Councils vying for their limited funds.

But, at the same time, we need to get smarter with the way we use our roading network. It is unsustainable to keep building bigger and bigger roads to cater to single–occupancy vehicle use.-

Some say that we need to move people onto public transport as the answer in the future.

A public transport system may be a part of that future but better networking with private industry is likely to provide a more economic and more efficient service that can adapt to changing transport needs. Working together for better results.   

We don’t know what the future of transport will look like. But we do know that it will look very different from the transport of today. Until about the 1930s, coastal shipping was the main method of transporting people and goods around New Zealand. Newmans were running horse–drawn coaches up until 1918. Since then we have progressed to 50 plus tonne trucks and electric cars.

Looking to the future, we already have the technology for self-drive cars, uber is trialling automated passenger drones. It would not be prudent for the Council to try and constrain future transport solutions to more buses, electric or otherwise. Nor would be good business practice for the Council to compete with private enterprise looking to maximise the use of new technology.

In recent months I have worked with Kate Malcolm of the Nelson Tasman Transport Trust and Hilary Bird of the Wakefield Rest Home to facilitate the establishment of a Wakefield bus service trial. While this may not be the ultimate solution to our transport woes, it does show that public/private partnerships can operate well (if locals support the service!).

We also need to rethink the way we deliver cycleways in the region. With the advent of e-bikes and various other forms of electric powered people movers the older generation is far more mobile even when they are not able to use cars. These vehicles have a range of up to 50 kms. So why do we not build “cycleways” that are both wide enough and properly constructed to accommodate mobility scooters and bikes.  Is this a case of less is more, and a job worth doing is worth doing right?

Relieving traffic congestion and reducing greenhouse gases needs a more holistic look at what we are doing with our transport network. More of the same just won’t cut it, Tasman deserves Better.

Filed Under: Transport Tagged With: Dean McNamara, Tasman, Transport

Business

14/08/2019

business plan for success in Tasman

We have a strong primary production industry in Tasman that we need to support, but we need to encourage more value adding businesses. We need to encourage innovative technologies to support our traditional industries, encourage cottage industries and help them progress to larger businesses.

Tasman needs greater engagement with youth, and businesses need to help provide our youth with pathways to skilled employment. For too long the youth of Tasman have had to leave the region to train and utilize their skills. It then becomes an expensive and often futile exercise to attract them back to this region.

Business collaboration and working with partners for growth opportunities need to be explored more.

What can the Tasman District Council do to facilitate better a business environment?

One of the major problems in this region is housing, and affordable housing. Another is the “sunshine wages” culture that this region has become infamous for. Businesses need to step up and pay a living wage in conjunction with the Council working harder to encourage more affordable housing options.

  • The Council needs to create a more stable and supportive environment for business to operate in.
  • The Council needs to develop an economic development plan with a holistic view of the region.
  • The Council needs to stop subsidizing selected businesses at the expense of other businesses.
  • The Council needs to stop providing services that compete with private enterprise.

The Tasman region is more than a handful of irrigators on the Waimea plains and a collection of large retirement villages. Tasman District Council needs to broaden its vision for our region.

Tasman needs a diverse economy, more jobs paying higher wages, and a council with a more holistic approach to the region.

Dean Mcnamara for mayor

Tasman District Council needs to create an environment that facilitates co-funding, resources and training for business startups. But we need to elect a council that understands that subsidising businesses is not the same as giving grants or providing resources for entrepreneurs to develop a business. A prime example of this is the recent decision to give money to subsidise electric bike recharge stations — instead of facilitating a micro business opportunity for a secure “park and charge” with bike service facilities, luggage storage, or a coffee recharge. Providing a business opportunity and saving a ratepayer subsidy.

Businesses that create value add opportunities to our primary produce, or that work in the technology sector to support our primary sector, both lift our poor GDP (we are the second-lowest region in the country) and lift our average wages (we are 14% below the national average).

We need to work together as a business community and as a community as a whole to turn our region around and recreate the vibrant and diverse community that we were once known for.

business plan for success in Tasman

It starts with a plan. If we don’t have one we will continue to fall behind the rest of New Zealand and we will remain a district of retirement homes with a few horticulturists – not that they are bad in themselves, but we have focused on them for the past 12 years under the current Council leadership.

It is time for this Council to get its eye back on the ball with a Mayor who has some business acumen. Which is why I am voting McNamara for Mayor.

Filed Under: Business, Your Say Tagged With: Business, Dean McNamara, Regional growth, Tasman

Inclusive Council

14/08/2019

inclusive council

Clear and honest communications. Responsibility for outcomes. Genuine Community Engagement. We need to get better at listening to the voices of Tasman residents.

I have been a part of a council that published propaganda that was neither informative nor constructive. I have been a part of council that was afraid to hold a referendum on a significant issue. I have seen us consult but not listen. I have seen significant decisions made by casting vote.

But I think we can do better as a Council. I would like to see us adopt the following points as a base on which to build our relationship with ratepayers.

  • Transparency – Information relating to council decisions and actions is easily accessible and easily understood, especially to those who are most effected by the decisions.
  • Accountability – Council assumes responsibility for the outcomes of the decisions it makes and the actions it takes.
  • Community Engagement – Council undertakes meaningful dialogue with the community in its decision-making processes and in shaping the vision for the Tasman District.
  • Inclusion – Council recognises that the Tasman community includes a diverse population dispersed across the entire region and will proactively include the needs of the entire community when distributing resources.

Starting from a position of partnership with our community would be a welcome change. Rather than spending large amounts of time and money in damage control we should take the community on the journey with us not being afraid to listen to their feedback along the way.

 I believe that the people of Tasman are smart enough to make the hard decisions when presented with the facts rather than needing to be brainwashed with propaganda. We all want the Tasman district to prosper and be an enjoyable place to live for generations to come. We would also like our families to be able to afford to live here.

I am not afraid to use binding referendums on items of huge significance to the entire Tasman region. We consulted without deliberation on the Waimea Dam, and the mayor denied a referendum twice by casting vote, and yet the implications of the decision to accept the current dam funding model that has monumental rate implications for at least the next ten years. Our core service deliverability is severely restricted without significant rate increases. You should have had a say.

Vote McNamara for a council that is prepared to listen.

Filed Under: Inclusive Council Tagged With: accountable council, Dean McNamara, inclusive council, referendum

Next Page »

Introducing Dean

Dean McNamara Husband, father, and a fourth generation local from rural Tasman. No longer acting as your voice on the Tasman District Council (TDC). More about me.

Email Newsletter

Sign up to be informed of important news and upcoming events

Make your voice count

Testimonials

Fantastic Speech

It was great to have your involvement in the dawn blessing of the Mapua Sculpture at the beginning of March. Thank you for the fantastic speech which encapsulated the essence of what the Sculpture Project is all about.

Janet Taylor
Ruby Coast Initiative Trust

You Rock

[Thankyou] for standing up for democracy & the people you represent. In the words of a younger generation “You Rock”!

Beth McCarthy
Takaka

keep sticking it to them

What a great pity there aren’t more councilors like yourself, who stand for council on behalf of the voters, and who remain steadfast in their commitment to being voter representatives and not council mouthpieces

Gary Thorpe
Read more testimonials
  • Testimonial Submission Form

Councillor McNamara: As Reported In The News

  • Latest News
    • Yet Another Unbudgeted Spend
    • Dam Tax Bites Little Guys
    • Freedom Camping Waste
    • No Support For Dam Report
    • Developing Within Boxes
    • Grandstand Funding Folly
    • Population Projections
    • Recycling Lunacy
    • Another Dam Blow Out
    • Councillors Not Qualified Directors
    • Mapua Boat Ramp
    • Pokies Sinking Lid Policy
    • No More Mayoral Casting Vote
    • Votes By Ward
    • Returning as Councillor
  • News From Last Term
    • Signing Off
    • Waste (of) money
    • Port Tarakohe
    • Free Charging Not Free
    • Re Election Candidates
    • NZTA Priorities
    • Mapua Upgrade Begins
    • Another vote Uturn
    • Traffic Woes Government Nos
    • Consult Fairy Tales
    • Capital Stop-Works
    • Kempthorne Quits
    • 20 million not a significant change
    • Over paid Councillor
    • Dam Train Wreck
    • Death Vote For Dam
    • Dam Scarce Water
    • Barbershop Gossip
    • Dam budget blowout
    • Dam Secrets
    • Wakefield Water Supply
    • Kempthorne Casting Votes
    • Mapua Gateway Sculpture
    • Mayor Spends Up Again
    • Mayor has a talk
    • Alleged Propaganda
    • Dam Affodability Questioned
    • Dam Funding Questions
    • Dam Questions
    • Storm Water Priorities
    • Knitting up a storm
    • Old guard take on new committee roles at Tasman District Council

Archives

Share the joy

Why Vote McNamara?

I am MOTIVATED.
I have business EXPERIENCE.
I am fiscally FRUGAL (some say tight!).
I am a born and bred LOCAL - here to stay
I am CONTACTABLE - reach me through this website.
I know together WE CAN DO BETTER.

Tags

3 waters Campground casting vote cost of the dam council councillor role dam overruns Dean McNamara Debt decisions Dr Mike Joy Easter Trading Election fine print free lunch Funding inconsistencies lie Lies Mandates McKee Memorial Reserve performance Pigeon Valley Fire rate affordability Rate increase rates Richmond risks rules Shane Jones spending stormwater strategic misrepresentation Tasman Tasman council elections Tasman District Council tdc TDC propaganda vote Waimea Community Dam Waimea dam waimea irrigators water water bylaw WIL

Copyright © 2025 · TDCME.nz · Powered by Nz Marketing Systems · Log in

This website is authorized by Dean McNamara 22a Edward Street Wakefield