TDC Me

Your Say

Together we can achieve more

  • Home
  • Inclusive Council
  • Environment
  • Water
  • Housing
  • Business
  • Transport
  • Dam
  • Contact
  • About
    • Testimonials

Amazing Sleight Of Hand From The Mayor

05/04/2018

Mayor Kempthorne changes his mind again

Our Mayor demonstrated his amazing sleight of hand abilities at today’s council meeting.  As a result of the tragic impact of the recent cyclones, the Mayor offered to give $3000 of his Mayoral Discretionary fund to the personal hardship fund for cyclone relief. A noble action. Unfortunately, in the same report, he requested funding for a paid-for vacation to Kiyosato to sip Saki in celebration of the 120-year friendly city anniversary to the tune of $3000.

Mayor changes his mind again
The Magic Mayor

I am not sure that businesses and individuals whose livelihoods and lives are in tatters would appreciate the irony of this situation, especially given the $130,000 salary that the mayor is on. However, when one councillor asked the mayor if he was happy to be known as the mayor who gives with one hand and takes with the other he confirmed that he was. I personally am left speechless.

Cr greening suggested that like fringe benefit tax, council should only fund half of the mayor’s trip to Japan given there was likely to be some private benefit. Although some might perceive that approach as funding a one-way ticket?

But wait, there is more …

At the previous full council meeting, I moved a proposed motion to amend standing orders to allow youth representatives to sit in on council meetings and I included an extra point to remove the abilities of chair’s to use a casting vote in the case of a tied vote.  I did this because I have lost confidence in the Mayor’s ability to use his casting vote in a financially prudent manner (as his track record has been to use his extra vote to spend money – such as $3million extra on the dam, and $80 thousand for temporary grandstand seating).

However, instead of allowing the motion to be put the Mayor chose to ignore my amendment and put the motion as it was originally drafted. At the time he said that the alteration was out of scope and that the casting vote discussion would come back to council in a future workshop. Magically, there was no record of this debate, the proposed amendment, or the fact that I moved the motion that appeared in the minutes of the previous meeting.

Today I asked the mayor what progress there had been in scheduling in the casting vote workshop, he responded that he had decided not to bring a workshop to council after all. Before I became a reformed blogger I would have used colourful language that would have described this change of mind as an instance where I had been lied to, of course now I would just say that mayor changes his mind — a lot.

I should have expected such a mind change event as it is not an uncommon position that I find myself in. A similar event happened when early on in my council career I moved a motion that Councillor Greening should be the council representative on the Saxton Sporting Complex subcommittee. At the time the Mayor wanted the Deputy Mayor to be appointed and a hasty tea break was arranged to convince me to change my motion to that end. The deal struck was that the Deputy Mayor would be appointed for a one-year term and after which councillor Greening would take up the role.

One year later and the Deputy Mayor stood down, however without so much as the courtesy of an aside, the Mayor put councillor Tuffnell up as the replacement. Obviously, it is the Mayor’s privilege to change his mind as he sees fit, no matter what arrangements he has made with other people. Just as it is apparently the Mayor’s privilege to run council meetings without regard to standing orders and instead institute his own rules on how meetings should proceed – as we were informed today.

This total lack of balance (some people might prefer colourful words such as integrity and honesty) has plagued my time in council and frustrated numerous logic-based arguments that I have tried to present.

I refused to sign off on the Long Term Plan (LTP) that council proposed to put out to public consultation because it states that Council’s number one financial strategy is to act prudently (another discussion that failed to make the minutes because it was not deemed worthy). This prudent strategy is in direct conflict with the words of the-now-exiting CEO and the Corporate Services Manager in their joint report to council in May 2015 that stated that Council would NOT be acting in a prudent manner if they were the last-man-standing when it comes to dam overrun expenses. The same situation that the current dam proposal leaves Council exposed to.

Today’s report from the CEO on the Provincial Growth Fund that the Government is doling out contained a number of options for the council to consider putting forward as potential recipients of the fund. One of the suggestions for consideration was the Waimea Dam Financing. The rationale being to “alleviate ratepayer risk with regards to any potential cost overruns for construction of the Waimea Dam and to remove the underwrite risk.”

Reducing the council’s risk exposure is a great and worthy cause you might say as a ratepayer liable for the aforementioned risks. However, I am confused. In previous staff reports, I have been told that it would be almost impossible for WIL to default on their crown loan that council is underwriting, and I have been assured on numerous occasions that despite most large-scale dams suffering significant over-run expenses the Waimea Community Dam is 95% certain to come in on or under budget. And somehow there remains a risk to ratepayers that needs mitigating?

I am not comfortable lying to the rate-payer, or “changing my mind” as I see fit.

My short tenure in the murky world of the council has enlightened me to the hopelessness of my campaign platform – to bring more accountability to the council.  This is not a change that can be made from the bottom, it needs to be lead from the top.

Filed Under: Your Say Tagged With: Magic Mayor, TDC propaganda

Lies Damned Lies and Statistics

14/08/2017

waimea plains picture

Following the distribution of the Newsline – the dam special edition, I have fielded a number of communications questioning the level of “propaganda” that council has stooped to. Initially, I was somewhat surprised of the response as my copy had not been delivered.  Interestingly, councillors had been receiving a pre release copy of Newsline for proof reading. This copy was not circulated prior to publication, so I did not have an opportunity to address the errors before it went public. Given that my opportunity to address issues privately was not given I will address my issues in the open forum.

Without getting bogged down in the fine print, I will just address the glaringly obvious propaganda as presented pictorially. The first obvious use of “Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics” (as penned by an author of disputed origin) is found in the picture on the front page.
waimea plains picture
One wonders why a discussion about the Waimea Plains, as affected by the Waimea Community Dam, shows a picture of the Wai-iti Plains – not affected by the Waimea Community Dam?

Yes, it is possible to see the Waimea plains in the distance, but a good half of the land pictured shows land that comes under the 88 Valley (or commonly referred to as the Kainui) water scheme and is not affected by the Waimea Community Dam discussion.

The use of the picture really just highlights how little land mass we are really talking about when we hear the stories of great woe that befall the world food supply (as present to council by John Palmer) or the national food supply (as reported in Newsline).  Yes, there may be some impact locally to vegetable prices until another source is found in a no dam scenario, but a dire impact globally? Interestingly, the boutique crop of hops as mention in Newsline are mostly grown outside the Waimea Community Dam catchment – which makes one wonder if John Palmer is writing Newsline now.

Moving on we come to the pictures following the Mayor’s soliloquy.weight loss before and after

Sorry, these are not the dam pictures they are pictures of Bailey – winner of the 90 day weight-loss challenge at lifetime-weightloss.com.  And while I congratulate Bailey on her efforts, I find the photos used here typical of photos used in this genre of advertising.

And I am sure that many of  you will have noticed that in advertising the benefits of the Waimea Community Dam  that we have used the same template as the traditional weight loss miracle cure before and after photos.Waimea River With Dam

With a dam we use the flash on, bright colours, full make-up, hair fresh from the salon, and big smile template.  It is a sunny day, we have chosen a cross-section of the river where there is lots of green grass in the picture, and the fish are playing happily (we can assume).

No dam no sun pictureWithout a dam the story is much different. There is no smile, no make-up, no flash photography, and the hair is messy.  Or at least the picture has been photo-shopped to appear devoid of 90% of the colour. Ironic really given that the water crisis generally occurs mid summer. We have also chosen a different cross-section of the river that contains no greenery, only grey lifeless gravel, and one can only imagine in this Armageddon-like scene that the fish are not smiling at all.

The reality is that had both pictures been taken from the same perspective on equally sunny days you would barely see a difference between an 1100 litre per second flow an 800 litre per second flow.

Of course that is not the only occurrence of where we have refused to let the facts get in the way of a good story.

average water use for common tasks chart

“Average” in a mathematical sense usually refers to a mean average or a median average figure. Median being a mid point figure, and mean referring to number generated when the sum of figures is divided by the number of figures used.

In this list of common water usage activities the term Average would appear to mean something entirely different – I am not sure what. Take for instance the average figure given for flushing the toilet, here it is given as 11 litres. While old single flush toilets may have used 11 litres per flush or more, the Caroma national survey reveals 60% of households use a split flush system, most of which operate on a 6/3 litre flush and newer design toilets are even more economical again with their water use. So, for the “average” flush to be 11 litres some people must be using their bath as a header tank to flush the toilet.

The same can also be applied to the 5 litre figure given for hand washing. That is two and a half ice-cream containers of water used for every hand wash. Some people must have a lot higher water pressure than me, or they take an extra ordinarily long time to wash their hands, or again, they are filling the bath to wash their hands if the “average” figure is 5 litres per hand wash.

The next chart that I would highlight is exactly the kind of use of statistics that the author of the “lies, damned lies, and statistics” quote would have been referring to, I am sure. Augmentation option statistics

Council staff will apparently tell you that this accurately represents the associated costs of the dam to urban water users.

The first fallacy is that it assumes that urban supply users are not general ratepayers as well because there is no ongoing costs for “environmental flow” included in the graphic – which is odd because they include the environmental flow component of construction costs. Even in this model urban supply users will be paying general rate subsidies of the actual cost of water supply from the Waimea Community Dam. I repeat, these figures are not shown on the table.

The other issue with this model is that “environmental flow” costs have been segregated out in the first place. When this model was first presented to council environmental flow was described a separate entity from water extraction. What has since come to light is that environmental flow is a direct cost of using the river as a conduit to run water from the augmentation source (the community dam) to the end user.

The reason that all the other options looked at are outrageously expensive by comparison to the Waimea Dam is because all the other options have to include piping from augmentation source to end user. We cannot use the river as a conduit to channel the water if we are putting in X litres of water at the top and taking the same X litres of water out at the bottom of the river (or where ever extraction occurs). To use the river in this manner would necessitate supplying a certain level of environmental flow above the water extraction levels which none of the other options have capacity for.

Not only is there a saving in piping by using the river as a conduit, there is also a large saving from treatment because the river is doing the bulk of the “treating” of the water for us when it is used as a conduit.

Therefore, the cost of using the river as a conduit (rather than piping and potentially treating) is that environmental flow has to be accommodated for.  This is not a “public benefit” cost that should be attributed to the general rate payer, this is a water extractor cost that is currently being directly subsidised by the general rate payer. Another means by which the general rate payer is being expected to prop up the billion dollar industry generated from irrigation on the Waimea Plains.

Finally, I would question the doughnut chart that depicts financial contributors to the dam.break down of dam financial contributions

Little details like the “SPENT” portion is added on the opposite side to the council contribution could raise eyebrows. I am wondering what genie contributed these spent funds.  At this rate the dam will be built using “spent funds” and council will announce that we have saved the rate payer $25 million by not using the allocated budget from the Long Term Plan, even if it costs council $50 million in spent funds.

But, I guess that is how we can keep council contribution to the quoted 33% if we don’t include spent funds, which looks like a really good bargain.

There is also the small matter of CIL contributions included as the same colour as Waimea Irrigators $15 million contribution. In my business education I understood that the person who underwrites a loan is the person responsible for the loan (many a parent, and best friend, has come unstuck by not fully appreciating this fact). Given that council is being asked to underwrite the CIL loan it could be considered misleading at best, and down right deceptive at worst, to attribute that loan directly as WIL contributions.

If the Waimea Community Dam is the goose that lays the golden eggs:

as the proponents of the dam would have us believe, then why is it consistently being over-sold?

The most damage to the dam progress has not been fliers delivered by Murray Dawson or other anonymous detractors. The most damage to dam goodwill among the general rate payers is the constant and consistent propaganda put out by the Council and Waimea Irrigators.

Why are we using suspect at best statistics, and outright lies to sell what is reputedly a no-brainer for the Tasman District?

Yes, I said outright lies. If you consider that none of the above are lies, then panic not. I have other examples where I have been directly lied to in relation to questions I have raised, and information that has been presented to me as a councillor with regard to the Waimea Community Dam. Examples that will have to wait for another post as this post is supposed to be a quick analysis of some of the obvious propaganda presented in the Newsline special edition.

We could have looked at some of the anomalies in the small print but given that the recipients of Newsline are obviously deemed to be imbeciles by the authors of Newsline one would assume that the recipients don’t read the articles.

Perhaps the Waimea Community Dam is actually a lemon painted up to look like a Ferrari?

Perhaps we should accept the offer ( or threat, depending on how you read the articles) of the Waimea Irrigators who have publicly stated they will pack up and move on if the dam is not built?  That would solve the over allocation of water situation amongst the irrigators and those that remain will then have a greater security of supply.

It is hard to see the best solution amidst all the smoke and mirrors and statistics spewing forth from the irrigator/council marketing department.

Filed Under: Projects, Spending, Your Say Tagged With: TDC propaganda, Waimea Community Dam, Waimea Dam lies

Introducing Dean

Dean McNamara Husband, father, and a fourth generation local from rural Tasman. Now acting as your voice on the Tasman District Council (TDC). More about me.

Email Newsletter

Sign up to be informed of important news and upcoming events

Make your voice count

Testimonials

Fantastic Speech

It was great to have your involvement in the dawn blessing of the Mapua Sculpture at the beginning of March. Thank you for the fantastic speech which encapsulated the essence of what the Sculpture Project is all about.

Janet Taylor
Ruby Coast Initiative Trust

You Rock

[Thankyou] for standing up for democracy & the people you represent. In the words of a younger generation “You Rock”!

Beth McCarthy
Takaka

keep sticking it to them

What a great pity there aren’t more councilors like yourself, who stand for council on behalf of the voters, and who remain steadfast in their commitment to being voter representatives and not council mouthpieces

Gary Thorpe
Read more testimonials
  • Testimonial Submission Form

Councillor McNamara: As Reported In The News

  • Latest News
    • Yet Another Unbudgeted Spend
    • Dam Tax Bites Little Guys
    • Freedom Camping Waste
    • No Support For Dam Report
    • Developing Within Boxes
    • Grandstand Funding Folly
    • Population Projections
    • Recycling Lunacy
    • Another Dam Blow Out
    • Councillors Not Qualified Directors
    • Mapua Boat Ramp
    • Pokies Sinking Lid Policy
    • No More Mayoral Casting Vote
    • Votes By Ward
    • Returning as Councillor
  • News From Last Term
    • Signing Off
    • Waste (of) money
    • Port Tarakohe
    • Free Charging Not Free
    • Re Election Candidates
    • NZTA Priorities
    • Mapua Upgrade Begins
    • Another vote Uturn
    • Traffic Woes Government Nos
    • Consult Fairy Tales
    • Capital Stop-Works
    • Kempthorne Quits
    • 20 million not a significant change
    • Over paid Councillor
    • Dam Train Wreck
    • Death Vote For Dam
    • Dam Scarce Water
    • Barbershop Gossip
    • Dam budget blowout
    • Dam Secrets
    • Wakefield Water Supply
    • Kempthorne Casting Votes
    • Mapua Gateway Sculpture
    • Mayor Spends Up Again
    • Mayor has a talk
    • Alleged Propaganda
    • Dam Affodability Questioned
    • Dam Funding Questions
    • Dam Questions
    • Storm Water Priorities
    • Knitting up a storm
    • Old guard take on new committee roles at Tasman District Council

Archives

Share the joy

18
Shares

Why Vote McNamara?

I am MOTIVATED.
I have business EXPERIENCE.
I am fiscally FRUGAL (some say tight!).
I am a born and bred LOCAL - here to stay
I am CONTACTABLE - reach me through this website.
I know together WE CAN DO BETTER.

Tags

3 waters Campground casting vote cost of the dam council councillor role dam overruns Dean McNamara Debt decisions Dr Mike Joy Easter Trading Election fine print free lunch Funding inconsistencies lie Lies Mandates McKee Memorial Reserve performance Pigeon Valley Fire rate affordability Rate increase rates Richmond risks rules Shane Jones spending stormwater strategic misrepresentation Tasman Tasman council elections Tasman District Council tdc TDC propaganda vote Waimea Community Dam Waimea dam waimea irrigators water water bylaw WIL

Copyright © 2023 · TDCME.nz · Powered by Nz Marketing Systems · Log in

This website is authorized by Dean McNamara 22a Edward Street Wakefield