TDC Me

Your Say

Together we can achieve more

  • Home
  • Inclusive Council
  • Environment
  • Water
  • Housing
  • Business
  • Transport
  • Dam
  • Contact
  • About
    • Testimonials

Redesigning Richmond

05/09/2016

View of Northern Richmond entrance

Current Mayor Richard Kempthorne is patting himself on the back on meeting the housing accord agreement terms signed with the Government.  His consortium of developers in the “development forum” have managed to assist the supply of a total of 228 sections and 394 building consents in the region.

Kempthorne said a development forum had been established involving the council and developers. While it might be “tested at times”, it was working well. Post-election, Kempthorne said he would be asking “how can we take this forward and enable intensive development – going up not out as much”

It may be working well for the development consortium but individuals trying to build a house are still waiting up to nine months for consent to be processed by the council.  However, consents aside, this push for large-scale urban development  is not being backed up with large-scale vision of essential services.

The Northern entrance to Richmond is about to see the addition of a fuel station and proposed supermarket at the Champion Road and  Salisbury Rd intersection.  The site of the fuel station was zoned for tourist services which specifically excludes fuel stations, but Tasman District Council resource consents manager Phil Doole made the difficult decision to allow consent to be granted without public notification anyway.

Equally enigmatic is the process by which the application by Progressive Enterprises Ltd to rezone of about 1.3 hectares of land on the corner of Salisbury and Champion roads from residential to commercial is being handled. As a frustrated Cr Judene Edgar pointed out that the current members of the council, who by in large all campaigned on a platform of spending reduction, have farmed out the decision making to expensive experts meeting in Auckland.

Not only have council relinquished control of development in Tasman, at great expense, they are allowing these experts to make decisions without any public consultation.  By the time the public is informed the process of consent is that far down the track that it is already a case of a rubber-stamping formality.

I am sure those who travel this road regularly at rush hour will be excited at the prospect of two more significant additional sources of traffic fighting for access to the current roundabout woes.  Then, of course, there is the issue of parking.  Will this development cater to the parking requirements of the staff? Or will staff be forced to park on an already too narrow Champion road adding to the almost unpassable congestion near Garin college? The current form of this council would suggest developers only have to cater to customer parking.

If this is the “right track” for the development of Tasman, perhaps it is about time we starting asking where exactly the track is taking us? And who is steering us down it?

 

 

Filed Under: Projects, Your Say Tagged With: consent, development, housing, planning, Richmond, tdc

Council Permits Building On The Estuary

26/08/2016

waimea-inlet-DOC

Mayor On The Right Track – Yeah Right!

Perhaps the permitted house is not exactly “on” the estuary, as in you don’t need a boat or to wait until low tide to access it, but it is certainly encroaching on the estuary.

The estuary that DOC describes as:

waimea-inlet-DOC
Waimea-inlet-DOC

Waimea Inlet is the largest semi-enclosed estuary in the South Island.

It is an important example of this ecosystem type. It provides habitat for:

  • rare or threatened native plants and animals, and
  • important populations of coastal wetland birds and migratory wading birds.

But the values of the Waimea Inlet ecosytem have been severely degraded and a restoration project is underway.

That almost sounds worthy of looking after don’t you think?

Yes, we have neglected and subjected it to all manner of degradation for years, but now we have turned a corner and decided to restore it as best we can before we lose it altogether.  Or have we?

proposed building on edge of estuary
Proposed building

George Hilgeholt applied to the council to build this building on the edge of the estuary at Johnstone Loop near Tasman.

What is the problem with that you say?

Well, the measuring stick used to portray the building in the picture submitted for approval seems to be the same one that council used to measure the building against compliance requirements for building in such a location.

When the building is drawn to the scale that coincides with the dimensions given by the architect the picture looks slightly different. In fact, it appears to look significantly different.

the actual scale of the eyesaw to built on the estuary
Using a more accurate scale

Not only is the building significantly more of an eye saw than the submitted rendition would indicate, it seems to have a few other issues that raise red flags too.

The following questions (and more) are raised by the Save Our Shores TDC Facebook page:

The Tasman District Council is ignoring the consensus to save, more intent on invade via RMA rule manipulation … Why would you allowed a new building to be 93% noncompliant – sited 7 metres from the Mean Springs Tide Water Mark versus the TRMP regulation of 100 metres of set back in Rural 1 let alone the Coastal Overlay? Why would you allow a building to have a Waste Water Secondary treatment to be within 7m of the high tide mark and a few metres from a wetland? Why have a national Coastal Policy height restriction of 5 metres – then allow a 6.7 metre building?

They seem like good questions to me.

Farmers in the outer extremities of TDC have had large tracts of their land ring-fenced because they are wetlands of national significance. I wonder how they feel knowing that the council has little regard for estuary wetlands?

What do you think?

 

Filed Under: Resources, Your Say Tagged With: coastline, permits, Tasman estuary, tdc, wetlands

Easter Trading The Rules Are Changing

24/08/2016

John Key passes buck

John Key finds more jobs for Kiwis.

He opens up Easter Sunday for trading.

OK, so he isn’t really finding more jobs, just more hours that you are allowed to work since you already get too many holidays and don’t know what to do with the time off.

And he isn’t stipulating that you have to work, or even that you can work.  He is saying that the issue of Easter trading is too complicated an issue for central Government, and he is tired of dealing with it every year, so he is making it a local Government issue.  A law change that he is railroading through by making National MP’s vote the party line in what has always been a conscience issue, because he can’t get the votes any other way.

Well done John Key. Way to earn your salary.

So the issue of should commercial entities open on Easter Sunday is now going to be a local body vote. Do you want TDC to allow retailers to open on Easter Sunday?  Do you want to lose one of the last few days of the year that employers can’t make family members work?  Do you want to open your shop because one day is the difference between you making a profit for the year or not?

Have your say, and elect a council that might actually listen to your voice.

 

Filed Under: Your Say Tagged With: Easter Trading, tdc, your vote

Dam Alternative Suggested

22/08/2016

88 valley dam

Brian Halstead, spokesman for a group of irrigators from Waimea Irrigators and Waters Users Inc, has suggested an alternative to the $82.5 million Waimea dam in the Lee Valley. The proposal is for a series of clay-lined, in-ground reservoirs along the Wairoa River to be filled during winter months. At an estimated cost of around $25 million, it is significantly cheaper than the dam option.

While that was less than half of the storage tipped for the proposed Waimea dam, it would “better serve the community and irrigators as a shorter-term measure at a fraction of the cost”.

The irrigators predict it will meet the needs of the irrigators in the Richmond / Mapua area for the next 40 years. The money generated from selling the water could also go toward paying down council debt.

The current mayor, Richard Kempthorne, welcomed the proposal and mayor hopeful, Maxwell Clark, branded it as an “excellent scheme” worthy of investigation. While Kit Maling, the other mayoral contender, was sceptical it would adequately meet the needs and did not want the dam proposal delayed because of a potential change of Government next year which could affect Government funding.

Read more here.

88 valley dam
Been here before

While this option is worth considering, I believe it is only better serving the community of irrigators, not the community as a whole. Council has already wasted an extraordinary amount of money on a temporary solution with the construction of a dam in the 88 Valley. This dam (which ran well over budget – surprisingly), has no water catchment and takes over 2 years to fill when emptied. It also drains through a swamp before the water makes its way to the river affecting the quality of water in the Wai-iti river.

The reservoir option sounds a lot like another stopgap measure that will provide short-term relief at the expense of the inevitable long-term requirement for the region.  That is 25 million (if on budget) plus the price of land purchase, on top of the millions spent in 88 valley, and still, we have the problem that the residential water supply is currently insufficient to meet current needs in dry years without accounting for future population growth.

There is no doubt that we need to meet the needs of irrigators, and soon before we have salt water intrusion into our aquifers. But can we afford to allocate another 25 million dollars on, at best, a 40-year stopgap?

I think Kit Maling is correct, we are better focusing on the dam that will future proof our water woes for years to come. Spend the money once and spend it right instead of throwing good money after bad.

What is needed is a better funding solution for the dam. Let us see some more creativity applied to that problem.

Your say?

 

Filed Under: Projects, Resources, Spending, Your Say Tagged With: irrigators, tdc, Waimea dam, water

Waimea Water Quality

13/08/2016

drinking water contaminated

Clean Green Tasman?

Remember how the Tasman District Council lost their fight to keep its secret contaminated site register under wraps?

It turns out that our record of preserving the integrity of our water is not a battle we are winning either.  The latest groundwater nitrate report shows little improvement and paints a bleak picture moving ahead.

The following excerpt is from the introduction of said  2005 WAIMEA PLAINS GROUNDWATER NITRATE SURVEY – REPORT EP05/11/11:

Over 90 groundwater samples were collected from the Waimea Plains aquifers between 19 May and 4 August 2005 and tested for nitrate. Well owners have been informed of their results. This survey was the fourth such plains wide survey of groundwater nitrate concentrations. Previous surveys were undertaken in 1986, 1994, and 1999/2000. . .Water Nitrate Levels
The most striking aspect to the data is the presence and persistence of areas of high nitrate concentration in the groundwater. Of all the bores sampled in the 2005 survey, 36% were above (i.e. did not comply with) the NZ drinking water standard of 11.3 g/m3-N.
Groundwater from the Waimea Plains is widely used. By volume irrigation is the predominant use, however, many households rely on groundwater for drinking water supplies, and a significant portion of the Richmond Municipal Water Supply is sourced from a bore field adjacent to Lower Queen Street.
The elevated nitrate concentrations encountered in the groundwaters of the Waimea Plains do not meet the groundwater quality required by Policies 33.1.3 and 33.1.4 and Schedule 36.1B of the TRMP. These policies require that the groundwater and land resources of the Waimea Plains are managed so that the groundwater is not contaminated so as to make it unpalatable or unsuitable for consumption by humans after treatment (equivalent to coagulation, filtration and disinfection). Nitrate contamination of water can not be readily treated by coagulation, filtration or disinfection. [emphasis mine]

If this is not concerning to those of you living in the affected drinking water area, it should also concern those who like eating fish, whitebait, and shellfish caught in or in the vicinity of the area. There are no practical treatment options for the removal of nitrate from groundwater.

Especially concerning, in case you missed it in the introduction, is the statement found in the summary: “There are no practical treatment options for the removal of nitrate from groundwater.”

In other words, this is not a problem that will go away unless we prevent it from occurring in the first place. It is especially pertinent as the problem crops up in another study.

The potential effects of the Lee dam on water quality are considered minor or able to be mitigated by providing flushing flows (up to three flushing flows over 5 m3/sec for >3 hours from November-April inclusive aimed at interrupting any periods of low flow >40 days) and good practice during dam construction (Young and Doehring, 2014). However, providing fish passage over the dam for red fin bully and longfin eel (downstream only with hydro-electric generation) will be challenging, and some off-set mitigation is recommended. There are potential indirect effects of the dam as more water available for irrigation could increase nitrogen leaching to groundwater, particularly on Ranzau soils where leaching rates are highest. Modelling (using SPASMO) has shown that, compared with nitrogen losses from current land uses, full irrigation within the Lee Dam service zone could increase nitrogen concentrations entering the groundwater by 23% and in a hypothetical worst case by up to 50% if the entire plains were converted to irrigated market gardening (Fenemor, 2013). These increases, however, are mitigated (diluted) by increased drainage rates to groundwater of 6% and 19% respectively caused by the increased irrigation. The effect of this on surface water would be most prominent in spring-fed streams in the lower Waimea Plains, particularly Neimann Creek.
2015 State of the Environment Water Quality Report information for the Waimea Water Management Area.

The dam itself may not be bad, but this study suggests that it will magnify our water nitrate issues (already failing the human consumption recommendations). I am not advocating that this means we should not build a dam, but I am advocating that we need to take the water nitrate issue seriously.

If we do not figure out a way of better managing nitrate levels before a dam is constructed then our clean and green image is going to be seriously tarnished by big hazard signs on waterways warning people not to drink the water. Remember we have no feasible method of treating nitrate infused water.

How seriously do you think the council should be taking this issue?

Do you think that no improvement between reports stretching back to at least 1986 reflects a council taking the issue serious enough?

 

 

Filed Under: Resources, Your Say Tagged With: clean image, tdc, water

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Introducing Dean

Dean McNamara Husband, father, and a fourth generation local from rural Tasman. No longer acting as your voice on the Tasman District Council (TDC). More about me.

Email Newsletter

Sign up to be informed of important news and upcoming events

Make your voice count

Testimonials

Fantastic Speech

It was great to have your involvement in the dawn blessing of the Mapua Sculpture at the beginning of March. Thank you for the fantastic speech which encapsulated the essence of what the Sculpture Project is all about.

Janet Taylor
Ruby Coast Initiative Trust

You Rock

[Thankyou] for standing up for democracy & the people you represent. In the words of a younger generation “You Rock”!

Beth McCarthy
Takaka

keep sticking it to them

What a great pity there aren’t more councilors like yourself, who stand for council on behalf of the voters, and who remain steadfast in their commitment to being voter representatives and not council mouthpieces

Gary Thorpe
Read more testimonials
  • Testimonial Submission Form

Councillor McNamara: As Reported In The News

  • Latest News
    • Yet Another Unbudgeted Spend
    • Dam Tax Bites Little Guys
    • Freedom Camping Waste
    • No Support For Dam Report
    • Developing Within Boxes
    • Grandstand Funding Folly
    • Population Projections
    • Recycling Lunacy
    • Another Dam Blow Out
    • Councillors Not Qualified Directors
    • Mapua Boat Ramp
    • Pokies Sinking Lid Policy
    • No More Mayoral Casting Vote
    • Votes By Ward
    • Returning as Councillor
  • News From Last Term
    • Signing Off
    • Waste (of) money
    • Port Tarakohe
    • Free Charging Not Free
    • Re Election Candidates
    • NZTA Priorities
    • Mapua Upgrade Begins
    • Another vote Uturn
    • Traffic Woes Government Nos
    • Consult Fairy Tales
    • Capital Stop-Works
    • Kempthorne Quits
    • 20 million not a significant change
    • Over paid Councillor
    • Dam Train Wreck
    • Death Vote For Dam
    • Dam Scarce Water
    • Barbershop Gossip
    • Dam budget blowout
    • Dam Secrets
    • Wakefield Water Supply
    • Kempthorne Casting Votes
    • Mapua Gateway Sculpture
    • Mayor Spends Up Again
    • Mayor has a talk
    • Alleged Propaganda
    • Dam Affodability Questioned
    • Dam Funding Questions
    • Dam Questions
    • Storm Water Priorities
    • Knitting up a storm
    • Old guard take on new committee roles at Tasman District Council

Archives

Share the joy

Why Vote McNamara?

I am MOTIVATED.
I have business EXPERIENCE.
I am fiscally FRUGAL (some say tight!).
I am a born and bred LOCAL - here to stay
I am CONTACTABLE - reach me through this website.
I know together WE CAN DO BETTER.

Tags

3 waters Campground casting vote cost of the dam council councillor role dam overruns Dean McNamara Debt decisions Dr Mike Joy Easter Trading Election fine print free lunch Funding inconsistencies lie Lies Mandates McKee Memorial Reserve performance Pigeon Valley Fire rate affordability Rate increase rates Richmond risks rules Shane Jones spending stormwater strategic misrepresentation Tasman Tasman council elections Tasman District Council tdc TDC propaganda vote Waimea Community Dam Waimea dam waimea irrigators water water bylaw WIL

Copyright © 2025 · TDCME.nz · Powered by Nz Marketing Systems · Log in

This website is authorized by Dean McNamara 22a Edward Street Wakefield