TDC Me

Your Say

Together we can achieve more

  • Home
  • Inclusive Council
  • Environment
  • Water
  • Housing
  • Business
  • Transport
  • Dam
  • Contact
  • About
    • Testimonials

Council Debt

11/01/2017

Debt quote from Jefferson

An upward trend.

The good, the bad, the ugly.

The gift that keeps on giving.

These, and others were in the running for a subtitle on this post. But I decided to just run with “Council Debt.” I will let you choose the subtitle.

There a couple of different views prevalent around the council table when it comes to debt.Debt quote from Jefferson One view suggests that debt is good, that we are running a debt level that is low (even too low). The other view is that debt is a burden that exposes us unnecessarily to interest rate hikes and the interest on debt consumes a lot of rates that could otherwise build libraries and fix storm water issues.

The view that our LVR (Loan to Value Ratio) is low is in this councilors opinion flawed. It based on a business model. I agree that if you are in business and your LVR is $130 million of loan to $1.5 billion of assets then you are in good shape if not over-capitalized.

The problem is that council is not (primarily) “in business.”  Some of that debt is associated with business ventures such as ports, camping grounds, and shed 4 (for better or worse), and this debt is now “ring-fenced” to the commercial activities that generated it (thanks to the foresight of the likes of Councillor Greening). However, there is a lot of debt that is generated by the many assets that council owns which are not income generating. In this category, we have the likes of roads, parks, water and wastewater, and a swimming pool (don’t get me started).

The funding for all of these non-income generating assets and the servicing of the associated debt falls back on the rate payer. Another mortgage on your property if you will. Like with any mortgage, when interest rates go up you have to pay more.  Unlike the business model where interest is tax deductible and increased costs just mean a lower shareholder return, this is private debt that you will have to find extra money to pay (in the form of rate increases).  The only way to maintain rating levels with rising interest rates is to cut services.

Some current councilors believe that our current debt of around $4000 per rate payer is too low. However, only 10 years ago that level was around $1700 per rate payer, and only 15 years ago was around $650 per rate payer. Because interest rates have been lower than expected, and we have been fortunate enough to not experience any major natural disasters the past couple of years, this council was in the position to hold the rate level at a below inflation increase.

While that seems like good news, it is not as good as it would have been had our debt been at the 15 year ago level. Nor was this current lolly scramble a unanimous choice as we look ahead to interest rates already starting to trend upward. We have been in unprecedented conditions to make a serious attempt at getting our debt down and have not capitalized on that opportunity as we could have, and by that, I mean actual debt reduction, not the often bandied about “lower than forecast” debt (which is not hard to achieve when you understand that forecast debt includes the unrealistic wish list). A choice that we will likely pay for in the future.

If you are at all concerned about the percentage of your rates going toward debt servicing it would pay to quiz candidates in future elections about what they mean by “concerned about debt” and “rate affordability” because it has vastly different meanings to those around the current council table.

Filed Under: Spending, Your Say Tagged With: council, Debt, tdc

Wake Up Tasman

10/08/2016

Tasman picture

Where have the past 3 years, or even the past 6 years, gone?

Time seems to fly by!

And if we are not careful another 6 years will have peeled off the calendar and we will still be facing the same issues that we faced 3 years ago.  Or worse, we will have created more debt and have bigger issues facing council and hence ratepayers.

I am not saying the current council has necessarily done a bad job, but could they have a done a better job? I think so.  Many of the incumbent councillors featured reduced spending as a priority on their last election profile. If they were on a performance based salary I do not think they would be calling a half million dollar overspend on a 1.2 million dollar project “a good investment.”  The project itself being a debatable investment in the first place when reduced spending was a priority.

Not to worry, they say, we can use the recent sale of forestry to off-set the budget blowout.  That is money that could have gone toward reducing debt, or enhancing core services, but is now lost to overspend.

Other purchases have also slipped under the radar during a period of debt reduction that would question the integrity of the claims made in the last election campaign. We are in a period of abnormally low interest rates and it should have been a time council was able to claw back some of the debt incurred in recent history, but it is looking like the opportunity will be squandered.

Lost opportunity is bad, but the cost to the ratepayer when interest rates spike again will not just be increased rate bills (yet again) as the council struggles to meet its debt repayment, but will also be a loss of extra amenities and service upgrades because there are no funds available. That is my children and your children paying for our “oops we had a 50% blowout.”

So this election I hope voters look past the slick rhetoric and vote according to historical performance and motivated sincerity.

Let’s keep Tasman an affordable place to live so we can enjoy the lifestyle that we grew up expecting.

 

 

 

Filed Under: History, Spending Tagged With: budget, council, performance, tdc

Introducing Dean

Dean McNamara Husband, father, and a fourth generation local from rural Tasman. Now acting as your voice on the Tasman District Council (TDC). More about me.

Email Newsletter

Sign up to be informed of important news and upcoming events

Make your voice count

Testimonials

Fantastic Speech

It was great to have your involvement in the dawn blessing of the Mapua Sculpture at the beginning of March. Thank you for the fantastic speech which encapsulated the essence of what the Sculpture Project is all about.

Janet Taylor
Ruby Coast Initiative Trust

You Rock

[Thankyou] for standing up for democracy & the people you represent. In the words of a younger generation “You Rock”!

Beth McCarthy
Takaka

keep sticking it to them

What a great pity there aren’t more councilors like yourself, who stand for council on behalf of the voters, and who remain steadfast in their commitment to being voter representatives and not council mouthpieces

Gary Thorpe
Read more testimonials
  • Testimonial Submission Form

Councillor McNamara: As Reported In The News

  • Latest News
    • Yet Another Unbudgeted Spend
    • Dam Tax Bites Little Guys
    • Freedom Camping Waste
    • No Support For Dam Report
    • Developing Within Boxes
    • Grandstand Funding Folly
    • Population Projections
    • Recycling Lunacy
    • Another Dam Blow Out
    • Councillors Not Qualified Directors
    • Mapua Boat Ramp
    • Pokies Sinking Lid Policy
    • No More Mayoral Casting Vote
    • Votes By Ward
    • Returning as Councillor
  • News From Last Term
    • Signing Off
    • Waste (of) money
    • Port Tarakohe
    • Free Charging Not Free
    • Re Election Candidates
    • NZTA Priorities
    • Mapua Upgrade Begins
    • Another vote Uturn
    • Traffic Woes Government Nos
    • Consult Fairy Tales
    • Capital Stop-Works
    • Kempthorne Quits
    • 20 million not a significant change
    • Over paid Councillor
    • Dam Train Wreck
    • Death Vote For Dam
    • Dam Scarce Water
    • Barbershop Gossip
    • Dam budget blowout
    • Dam Secrets
    • Wakefield Water Supply
    • Kempthorne Casting Votes
    • Mapua Gateway Sculpture
    • Mayor Spends Up Again
    • Mayor has a talk
    • Alleged Propaganda
    • Dam Affodability Questioned
    • Dam Funding Questions
    • Dam Questions
    • Storm Water Priorities
    • Knitting up a storm
    • Old guard take on new committee roles at Tasman District Council

Archives

Share the joy

18
Shares

Why Vote McNamara?

I am MOTIVATED.
I have business EXPERIENCE.
I am fiscally FRUGAL (some say tight!).
I am a born and bred LOCAL - here to stay
I am CONTACTABLE - reach me through this website.
I know together WE CAN DO BETTER.

Tags

budget blowout casting vote cost of the dam council councillor role dam budget dam overruns Dean McNamara Debt decisions Dr Mike Joy Easter Trading fine print free lunch Funding Governance inconsistencies Lies McKee Memorial Reserve P95 performance Pigeon Valley Fire rate affordability Rate increase rates Richard Kempthorne Richmond risks rules scaremongering mayor spending stormwater strategic misrepresentation Takaka grandstand Tasman Tasman District Council tdc TDC propaganda vote vote for change Waimea Community Dam Waimea dam waimea irrigators water water bylaw

Copyright © 2022 · TDCME.nz · Powered by Nz Marketing Systems · Log in

This website is authorized by Dean McNamara 22a Edward Street Wakefield